Although it sometimes seems like a controversial idea for many people, I believe firmly that different HEMA systems are in fact quite different from each other, and that the differences are more important than the similarities.
If our focus is trying to recreate historical martial arts, then we must follow the source material and not just make stuff up. This means learning to fence within the parameters of the system we study – which might, in turn, mean that we have to avoid pulling in too many ideas from elsewhere, as these may deviate us quite far from the intent of the original sources.
As I have developed my thoughts on the matter, I have written a number of articles about different aspects of systems and how they apply to our study and teaching of historical fencing. On this page, I have collected all these various articles about systems, so that they can all be found neatly in one place.
I have also written a summary of my philosophy for training and teaching, that I plan to keep updated and relevant as I write further articles on more topics. It is probably worth reading, as well as the following individual articles.
HEMA – A Systematic Approach (guest article by Nial Prince)
Tricks and systems
Age of the source and intent of the activity
Comparing different systems
Questioning the masters and sources
If you would like to support my writing efforts, please consider donating a little something towards my coffee fund!